Now what the hell is that?? Imagine something close to chocolate, but made from jackfruit seeds instead of cacao seeds. I thought that, it should be better addressed as ‘Jacklate’! And I am not daydreaming. Recently a team of researchers from Brazil has discovered that, flours made from fermented seeds of local jackfruits can yield flavors resembling caramel, hazelnut or fruity aromas. Not only that, they also have identified specific chemicals associated with chocolaty aroma from the flour. It seems in this world nothing is indispensable. That’s a great relief. Especially when chocolate industry is experiencing growing demand for cacao seeds which can’t bear the load alone. In many parts of the world, jackfruit grows abundantly and even wasted because of that. Along with the large fruit unripe or ripe, the seeds are also eaten roasted following boiling. Have you eaten that? They are tasty like nuts and go well with curries and rice. I like the jackfruit seeds but don’t eat the ripe jackfruit itself, because of its strong sweet smell which is distracting for many like me. Who guessed that the subtle sweet flavor of the seeds could be metamorphosed into such a delicacy. The discovery is awesome. I found this news really shareable.
Wish you all a happy new year just as you wish!
Don’t be afraid about the not so happy picture below! Everything is fine, just check the clock (which one!) if it is really on time to avoid nightmares. My first post on picturesque Nautilus, the different kind of science magazine, as well as my first jargon free science writing endeavor (outside wordpress) is trying to say something about that. In the process, I learned a lot, both about the topic I wrote about and science writing in real life. I have embedded the tweet from Nautilus for archival reason. Hope you find the story there newsful! Cheers!
Do you like to wear that same scarf everyday? Of course not, you have at least two or three. Variety is a natural inclination of nature. It should be allowed everywhere, otherwise there is trouble. Panama disease epidemic affecting banana cultivation is something similar and is a lesson to learn.
The recurring threat named Panama disease…
Domestication of banana started in prehistoric time about seven thousand years ago, as revealed by multidisciplinary research so far. The center of origin was the islands between south-east Asia and Australia. Breeding between two wild seeded Musa species, M. acuminata and M. balbisiana has produced a collection of edible variety, rich in genetic and visible phenotypic diversity. In this man handled evolution, the domesticated banana differed from their wild relatives significantly. They became seedless and incapable of sexual reproduction. However, only a few among them have always been chosen for mass cultivation. At present, the dessert banana, Cavendish variety is trending with 47 per cent of market share. In the late eighteenth century, however, a reportedly better tasting Gros Michel, a triploid (seedless) cultivar of M. acuminata was the dominant cultivar in the central and south America. In 1890 a wilting disease was noted in the Gros Michel plantations of Costa Rica and Panama. And it was severe as it eventually wiped out Gros Michel dominance by 1900. Can you believe? In 1910, the cause behind the devastation was disclosed. It is a fungus named Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cubense as it was found in Cuba. This fungus dwells in the soils and colonize the plant root and can go up leaving the plant dry and sick. They are very hard to manage requiring hazardous soil treatment. The easiest and quickest way is to get a fungus resistant variety instead. Thus banana business regained balance by helping themselves with a replacement, the Cavendish bananas from Honduras and United kingdom. Cavendish, a subgroup of the triploid cultivar of M. acuminata was not susceptible to the race 1 fungal strain which savaged Gros Michel. But unfortunately, the message to take home from this mega event went unnoticed. Another round of risky monoculture with Cavendish bananas only initiated. The lesson was still to learn.
How could a pathogen be so powerful on earth?
Fusarium oxysporum is a cosmopolitan pathogen that affects a wide range of crops as separate host specific strains. They can wait in the soil as spores for the perfect condition for life. In addition the seamless evolution of resistant races makes them hard to overcome. Thus, Gros Michel still comprise 12% of banana cultivation, but only in soils free or unaffected by race 1 of Fusarium oxysporum strain. The problem with edible bananas is more severe as they are propagating asexually. Their is least chance of generating genetic variation possible in each round of sexual reproduction. They are more or less genetically identical clones of the first Cavendish banana planted. On the one hand it helps to preserve the fruit traits that in the first place were admired for leading to selection among other available varieties. However, the absence of genetic variation leaves them hopelessly vulnerable. This is a golden opportunity for any pathogen which are evolving anyway out there. A chance meeting with the susceptible clone is just what required. Rest of the population is ready for the doomsday.
Panama disease is now epidemic…
We are now a global society. Pathogens around the globe are also enjoying the benefits of this globality. They are spreading through all possible sources from infected plant material to sanitation loopholes. In 1960, Cavendish banana was attacked again in Taiwan. In 1994, the responsible strain Tropical race 4, the updated version of Fusarium was identified. Since the 1990s, this new Avatar has wiped out Cavendish plantations in Indonesia, Malaysia and is threatening business in Australia, Philipines, Jordan, Pakistan, Lebanon affecting approximately 100, 000 hectares of cultivation area in total.
Of course big banana farms are aware of this and vigilant. They have varieties in hand to start over with, if circumstance goes awry. But that doesn’t stop us from asking the simple question. No matter how much safety measures are followed – aren’t we allowing the fungus to gain the upper hand? If banana was allowed its fair share of experimentation – may be that would be savoury not only sweet!
I loved this article reported by researchers in Belgium and Switzerland, published in the journal Applied and Environmental Microbiology as it is about chocolate! If you don’t know as I didn’t, fermentation is the first step in chocolate making. Inside the pod the bitter cocoa beans remain covered with a white gluey moist pulp composed of sugar and protein. The beans are piled together and covered with banana leaves. In this manner they are left for around one week with occasional aeration allowing microorganisms to grow initiating fermentation. This casts the heavenly spell. During fermentation, the pulp around the beans eventually drains out but leaves behind the characteristic flavors and aroma we are mad about. The microbes in the environment orchestrating the fermentation actually hold the magic wand. This microbial composition varies greatly with farms, seasons and beans. Of course, that’s why there are so many flavors to delight us. Among the fungi, yeast play a prominent role here. They produce enzyme that degrades the gluey pulp around the beans. Fermentation mediated by yeast converts the moist pulp sugar into ethanol, bacteria then oxidizes ethanol to acetic acid. The acid together with high heat kills the beans initiating chemical reactions which generate aromatic compounds that give chocolate its characteristic taste and flavor.
Yeasts as used in making bread and beer, is a standard commercial culture to ensure reliable, reproducible fermentation and production. Cocoa industry however, does not do that. They depend on natural fermentation. This leads to inconsistency and economic loss. The recent research done by the same research groups in Belgium and Switzerland, reports several experimentally proven efficient yeast cultures they have created to use in cocoa fermentation. The work was challenging as the environmentally selected microbial culture consists of a complex combination of yeast, lactic acid and acetic acid bacteria acting behind cocoa bean metamorphosis. Interestingly the bacterial diversity is much lower and more or less similar compared to fungal ones here. This led them to exclude the bacteria from the culture. Among the fungal crowd, luckily they found very familiar yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to be the dominant one. In the first place, to get rid of the complexity and uncertainty in the fungal part, they developed heat tolerant aggressive hybrids of S. cerevisiae strains that can outcompete the wild contaminant fungal strains favored by the high temperature tolerance and killer activity of hybrid yeasts. Killer activity means an ability to produce toxic products that is detrimental to the growth of the competitors. Additionally they showed that the aromatic profiles of the resultant chocolates using these novel cultures differed significantly. This arsenal of cocoa-fermenting yeast cultures with signature flavoring ability is a privilege for the chocolate industry to play with the flavors.
Are you ready to move on?
This work is really noteworthy in terms of technical advancement for standardizing cocoa fermentation. This promises reproducible and quality chocolate without a miss. The bread and beer industry have already refined their way regarding this issue. Cocoa industry can now move on as well. We are yet to know their say. Of course on the way we will have to leave behind some fungi (working in natural fermentation along with S. cerevisiae), we are not sure about. I think there should be enough discussion about those unsung fungi before any decision. If you are missing any fungus in your chocolate then that is another twist in this story. May be designer chocolate (with fungi of your choice) will be the next innovation granting your wish!..
Learning about food is itself a delightful feast. It is not only about gastronomical fulfillment. Food touches several aspects of our existence, justifying and enriching our long spun story on the planet earth. In fact, food has defined our culture and civilization. We are evolving over 4 million years along with our food preferences. The evolution of human diet is a dynamic ongoing process. Initially, we had little control, we were hunting and gathering whatever was on offer obviously fruits and meats. We didn’t know about dairy. Cereals and beans were yet to be made edible by neolithic farmers. For the last more or less 10,000 years only we are farming, trying to tame nature in our favor. In the meantime however, we are becoming a perpetual consumer society with and without our permission.
The process of domesticating wild food resource to make them cultivable, edible and profitable has always been experimental but goal oriented in nature. This leads to kind of shortsightedness and lack of common sense. As a result we often see such repeated mistakes in agricultural history that has posed suicidal for human race. All these problems when occurs seem local or isolated or of singular annoyance (not hurting us anyway!). We bypass the responsibility in the hustle bustle of daily grind knowingly and unknowingly. Ironically, however, admit or not, we are all connected in the grand scheme of things directly and indirectly. We are not sure at all, how long we will be allowed to run our experiments and adventures with this indifferent or unaccountable business only attitude! But I hope as I am wondering many others around the globe are also thinking alike. We can actually take charge in defining our society in this crossroad just by carefully studying our footprints after food.
Recently I am becoming more interested to know about facts related to food and well-being. Well actually we are all really interested about that but place it last in the priority list instead of among the topmost ones where it should be. We are from different walks and seasons of life busy with our daily drama to reach our goals or not knowing what else to do. God bless us! If I check my post records, so far I have written about cognition level of crows, plant tissue as water filter, telomeres, pea aphid, evolutionary origin of mustard and about socializing & marketing. Excluding the post about telomeres there is little focus on eating well and living well. And this can’t go long. There is a saying in my mother tongue (Bengali),
“ja debe ange, tai jabe sange”.
This means “eat well my dear, what you invest in yourself (body), that will remain with you (until heaven)”.
So be ready for some upcoming healthy blogging! I feel I am approaching my Goldilocks zone. We will see.
Who is your grocer? Do you like to buy your vegetables from that well maintained supermarket with its soothing ambiance or that unpolished farmers’ market with its chaotic charm? The answer I know will be,
I mean, if you are really scrupulous about a to z in your life or really settled about your grocery choice, you can give a sure answer. However, it could also depend upon factors beyond your personality type. As your answer depends upon which part of the country or which part of the world you are living at the moment as well.
Recently I visited Vienna in Austria. Farmers’ market is rare there if I am correct. Supermarkets are doing all the business and people seem to be happy for the time being. The above picture is a glimpse from Vienna’s Naschmarkt, a 16th century old open air market, now specially an area of tourist attraction and one of only a few of this kind.
In America (not New York of course!) a growing number of people however, are opting for farmer’s markets as that allow them to have more control over their knowledge about the origin and growth culture of their food. They are termed as “Locavores”. They like to consume locally grown food instead of the best quality product brought from the distant or opposite part of the world. Study on the roots of this kind of local food movement from University of Iowa says that the underlying emotion here is that the producers and consumers are directly connected and feel part of the same community.
In India local markets which are not necessarily always a farmer’s market but mostly open air are still thriving compared to supermarkets next to them. But, it is not that these markets give buyers a lot of news about the source of products. But consumers here again prefer the human connection (well that also includes negotiations to bitter quarrels for price everyday!). A surge of online marketing is visible here as well to make life comfortable.
Let’s do some generalization which is although partly but true of course. It seems America is tired of artificial comfort and heading for homemade marmalade. Europe (well, I know I have mentioned one city only!) is enjoying the so-called synthetic happiness for now. While Eastern world (considering the example of India) is still to go through the transitions seen by west.
If we haven’t forgotten, once upon a time not long ago, markets were the places of meeting of people from near and far for business, socializing and amusement. A change from life’s boredom when there was no internet. In today’s world people can buy grocery to amusement online and can socialize online again. But life is still boring now and then! Just as fashion goes and comes around, human craving for face to face sweet and sour socializing can never be off-market for long!